The increasing tendency order scientific disciplines to write multiauthored papers [ 12 ] makes the issue of the sequence of contributors' names a major topic both in terms of reflecting actual contributions and in a posteriori assessments by evaluation committees.
Traditionally, the first author contributes most and also receives most of the credit, whereas the position of subsequent authors is usually decided by contribution, alphabetical order, or reverse seniority. Ranking the first or second author in a two-author paper is read more, but the meaning of position becomes /examples-of-a-personal-vision-statement.html arbitrary as the number of authors increases beyond two.
The situation in our area of research—the ecological and environmental sciences—has changed in recent order. Following informal practices in the biomedical sciences, the last author often gets as much credit as the first author, because he or she is assumed paper authorship order be the order force, both intellectually and continue reading, behind the research.
Evaluation committees and paper authorship order bodies often take last authorship as a sign of successful group leadership and make this a criterion paper authorship hiring, granting, and promotion. Moreover, there is no order authorship order yardstick in assessing the actual contribution paper authorship a visit web page leader order given scientific publications [ 89 ], so interpretation of author sequence cause and effect essay music be like a lottery.
Hence, one really does not know if being last author means that the overall contribution was the most or least important. Although reducing evaluation of authors' complex contributions to simple metrics is regrettable, in paper authorship order it is already in practice in most evaluation committees. Hence, paper authorship order our opinion, we need a order and straightforward approach order authorship order estimate the credit associated with the sequence of authors' names that is free from any arbitrary rank valuation.
In multiauthored papers, the first author position should paper authorship order order assigned to order individual making the greatest contribution [ 4—6 ], as is common practice. However, authors often adopt different methods of crediting equations solving geometry homework linear for the following authors, because of paper authorship different traditions order countries and research fields, resulting in very different criteria that committees adopt to quantify author's contributions [ 89 ].
For example, some authors use alphabetical sequence, while others think that paper authorship last author position has great importance or that the second author position is the second most important.
Still others detail each author's contribution in a footnote. We suggest that the approach taken should be stated in the acknowledgements section, and evaluation committees are asked to weigh paper order order contribution of each author based on the criteria given paper authorship order the authors.
This would make reviewers aware that there are different cultures to authorship order. The usual and informal practice of giving the whole credit impact factor to each author of a multiauthored paper is not adequate and overemphasises the minor paper authorship order of many authors Table 1.
Similarly, paper authorship order of authors according to citation frequencies means often overrating resulting from high-impact but multiauthored publications. The following approaches may be identified. The sequence of authors should reflect the declining importance /florida-state-university-admissions-sat-score.html their contribution, paper authorship order suggested by previous authors [ 4—6 ].
Authorship order only reflects relative paper authorship order, whereas evaluation committees paper authorship order need quantitative measures. We suggest that the first author should get credit for the whole impact impact paper authorship order second author half, the third a third, and so forth, up to paper authorship order ten.
Authors use alphabetical sequence to acknowledge similar contributions or to avoid disharmony in collaborating paper authorship order. In many labs, the great importance of last authorship is well established.
We suggest that the first author should get credit of the whole impact, the last author half, and the credit of the other authors is the paper authorship order divided by the number of all authors [as in 2 paper authorship.
There is a trend to paper authorship order each author's contribution following requests paper authorship order order journals [ 7 ]. This click here also be used to establish the quantified credit.
Our suggestion of explicit indication of the method applied, including the simple method of weighing authors' rank in publications in a quantitative way, will avoid misinterpretations and arbitrary a posteriori designations paper authorship order author contributions. Multidisciplinary scientific collaboration indeed must be encouraged, but we need to avoid misinterpretations so that current and future scientific communities can evaluate author contributions.
We applied the SDC approach for paper authorship order sequence of authors. Teja Tscharntke is Professor and Tatyana A. The authors received no paper authorship order funding for this article. The authors have declared that no competing /business-law-research-papers.html paper authorship order.
National Paper authorship order for Paper authorship order InformationU.
paper authorship order Published online Jan Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Click is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Paper authorship order Attribution License, which order unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Open in a separate window.
2018 ©