Posted by Paul Wong Aug 23, Writing 0.
Evaluation of oral examination is based on dissertation proposal defense questions dissertation proposal defense questions samples presentation and your answers to questions from the examining committee. Be well prepared for your presentation—academically, mentally and physically. Try to be well rested and focused questions samples your oral defense.
You need to be familiar with larger issues, such as the basic assumptions, theoretical framework, paradigm, cross-cultural perspectives, Christian integration, etc. More importantly, you need to have a deep understanding of the nature of your research problem and the major issues involved.
You may bring with you important materials dissertation proposal defense questions samples easy reference in the course go here your defense; these may include key articles, computer print-outs of results, etc.
Link your presentation as a public address because there may be non-psychologists present at your defense.
You need to tell people in simple, concise language:. Make sure that you space yourself well. For example, you should not spend more questions samples 5 minutes on introduction, since you are allowed dissertation proposal defense 20 minutes for your presentation.
Most of the questions are rather general and questions samples, dealing with substantial source, theoretical questions samples application issues.
However, some questions focus on specific points regarding sampling, statistical analysis, or some questionable conclusions.
Be prepared to clarify or elaborate on your assumptions, dissertation proposal defense positions, methods, and conclusions. Occasionally, an examiner may ask a question which is unfair or cannot be adequately answered.
It is perfectly acceptable to think for a couple of seconds, dissertation proposal ask if you are on the right track. Defense questions samples you are not clear about the question, you are entitled to ask for clarification.
Try to be concise and to the point, but at the same time demonstrate that you have a good grasp questions samples the complex issues involved. In other words, do not give superficial answers, but at the same time, do not go dissertation proposal defense questions samples over the map.
Put up dissertation proposal defense questions samples good defense without being defensive. Be confident without being cocky. A good defense means that you can provide strong logical arguments as well as empirical support o defend your position or conclusion. If they are able to point out some real flaws or weaknesses in your study, accept dissertation proposal defense questions samples criticisms with humility, grace and gratitude. Then, discuss with click the following article advisor how to best address these concerns.
After the oral defense, dissertation proposal with your advisor for debriefing and seek advice on how to revise your thesis. Your presentation is evaluated in terms of content and clarity as well as style.
You need to tell people in simple, concise language: What you did, Why defense questions samples did it, How you did questions samples, What you found, and What the results mean.
Prepare handouts or power-points. Typically, they should include An overview questions samples outline of your dissertation proposal defense questions samples, Introduction including research question, rationale and hypothesis, if any, and definition of key constructsMethod including design, methodology, sample, instruments or questionnaires, and procedure, Results including tables or figures summarizing article source findingsand Discussion including reasons questions dissertation proposal defense questions samples new or unexpected findings, contributions and limitations, and practical implications.
Here are some common questions: If you were to do it all over again, what changes would you make? What specific aspects of your findings can be utilized by counselors or psychologists in their practice?
What is the most important contribution of your thesis?
Can you say it in one or two sentences? What are some of the competing hypotheses? Could you think of an alternative interpretation of your findings?
2018 ©