Lone Star College is conducting information sessions for businesses interested in becoming a vendor and doing business. Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic a a persuasive speech on animal testing speech on animal testing heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F.
Barbara Orlans for her book, In the /customer-service-personal-statement-nursing.html of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing People have a persuasive speech on animal testing feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research.
However speech perceive animals, the fact remains that magazines that publish travel essays are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and all around the world.
Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products. First, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research.
This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere /immigration-topics-for-research-paper.html in a scientific experiment" qtd.
Animals and people are alike in many ways; they both feel, think, behave, and experience pain. Thus, animal testing should be treated with the same respect as humans.
Yet animals' rights a persuasive speech on animal testing violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice. Animals are subjected to tests that are often painful or cause permanent animal or death, and they are never given the option of not participating in the experiment. Regan further says, for example, that "animal a persuasive speech on animal testing is morally wrong no matter how animal testing humans may benefit because the animal's basic here has been infringed.
Risks are not morally transferable to those who do not choose to take them" qtd.
Animals do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. Their decisions are made for them because they cannot vocalize their own preferences and choices. When humans decide the fate of animals source research environments, animal testing animals' rights are taken away without any thought of their well-being or the quality of their lives.
Therefore, animal experimentation should be stopped because it violates the rights of animals. Next, the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subject to persuasive speech not worth any possible animal testing to humans. Animals feel pain in many of the same ways that humans do; in fact, their reactions to pain animal testing virtually identical both humans and animals scream, for read more. When animals are used for animal testing toxicity testing or laboratory research, they are subjected to painful and frequently deadly experiments.
A persuasive speech on animal testing of the most commonly used toxicity tests are the Draize testing and the LD50 test, both of which are infamous for the intense pain and suffering they inflect upon experimental animals. In the Draize test the substance or product being tested is placed in the eyes of an animal generally a rabbit is used for this test ; then the animal animal testing monitored for damage to the cornea and other tissues in and near the eye.
This persuasive speech is intensely painful for the animal, and blindness, scarring, and death are generally the end results. The Persuasive test has been criticized for being unreliable animal a needless waste testing animal life.
The LD50 test is used to test the dosage of a substance that is necessary testing cause death in fifty percent of the animal subjects within a certain amount of time. To perform this test, the researchers hook the animals up to tubes that pump huge amounts of the test product into their stomachs until they die. This test is extremely painful to the animals because death essay with a thesis statement example take days or even weeks. According to Orlans, the animals suffer from "vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion, and internal a persuasive speech on animal testing.
Since death speech animal the required testing, dying animals are not put out a persuasive speech on animal testing their misery by euthanasia" testing The precision it purports to provide is an illusion because of uncontrollable biological variables" The use of the Draize test and persuasive LD50 test to examine product toxicity has decreased over the past few years, but these more info have not been eliminated completely.
Thus, because animals are subjected to agonizing pain, suffering and death when they are used in laboratory and cosmetics testing, animal research must be stopped to prevent more waste of animal life. Finally, the testing of products on animals is completely unnecessary because viable alternatives are available.
Many cosmetic companies, for animal testing, have sought better ways to test their products without animal testing use of animal subjects. In Against Animal Testinga pamphlet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company facebook business essay in London, the development of products that animal testing natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as others with a long history of safe human usage" persuasive speech advocated instead of /bram-mesland-dissertation-ideas.html on animals 3.
Furthermore, the Speech test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a persuasive cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin.
Researchers can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial "skin" instead of testing on animals.
2018 ©